Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

478 Resources

John Fortier and Charles Stewart IIIMIT Election Data and Science Lab/ American Enterprise Institute2021
In-Person Voting Reports

This report reviews multiple topics related to conducting the 2020 general election, including meeting the challenge of voting in person during the COVIS-19 pandemic.

Workforce Reports

The 2021 Local Election Official Survey explored the views and opinions of 233 local election officials. The survey finds that most election officials are motivated by desires to serve their local community, are concerned about harassment while on the job, and believe that social media is increasing political division.

Colin J. Jones, Robert M. SteinRice University2021
Workforce Academic Papers

In this paper, Jones and Stein test an expanded explanation for poll worker recruitment focused on reducing the demand for poll workers through efficiency gains. Based on the results of a national panel survey of election officials, authors find that in-person precinct voting on Election Day is a significant source of difficulty in obtaining poll workers. They offer widely available and political neutral strategies aimed at reducing poll worker scarcity.

Thessalia MerivakiMississippi State University2021
Workforce Academic Papers

The Administration of Voter Registration: Expanding the Electorate Across and Within the States analyzes the evolution and application of administrative election procedures at the state and local levels. It provides foundational knowledge for understanding the complexity of administering elections, specifically in regard to voter registration, and the key processes of administering elections.

Markie McBrayer, R. Lucas Williams, Andrea Eckelman2021
Workforce Academic Papers

This paper explores whether officials in county governments follow their partisan allegiances when selecting and siting early voting locations. Authors find that the partisanship of county governments does not influence the location of early voting sites, but has modest effects on the number of early voting sites.

Jennifer Gaudette, Seth Hill, Thad Kousser, Mackenzie Lockhart, Mindy Romero, Laura UribeCenter for Inclusive Democracy2021
Voter Trust Academic Papers

Report offering solutions on how public information campaigns by state election officials could mitigate polarized trust in election integrity.

Jennifer MorrellDemocracy Fund2020
Audits & Validating Elections Reports

In this report, Morrell guides jurisdictions through planning and conducting risk limiting audits pilots, including stakeholder preparation, logistics, and post-pilot evaluation.

Andrew W. Appel, Richard A. DeMillo, Philip B. Stark2020
Audits & Validating Elections Academic Papers

In this paper, authors argue that risk limiting audits can verify tabulation of paper records but cannot by themselves ensure ballot marking device printouts reflect voter intent if voters do not verify them.

Lisa Schur, Douglas KruseU.S. Election Assistance Commission2020
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report highlights key trends in voter turnout among voters with disabilities in the 2020 election. Authors note a significant increase in turnout among these voters compared to the 2016 general election, reducing the turnout gap with voters without disabilities to 5.7 percentage points. However, approx. 11% of voters with disabilities reported some difficulties voting.

Lisa Schur, Douglas KruseRutgers University2020
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report summarizes projections of how many people with disabilities would be eligible to vote in the November 2020 elections, using data from the Census Bureau’s 2014-2018 American Community Survey combined with Census Bureau population projections for 2020-2021. The report breaks down key demographic characteristics of eligible voters with disabilities.

David Cottrell, Michael C. Herron, Daniel A. Smith2020
Usability & Accessibility Academic Papers

In this paper, authors examine whether use of vote by mail exacerbates existing inequalities in mail-in ballot rejection rates. They find that younger voters were more likely to have their vote by mail ballot rejected than older voters due to lack of timeliness or deficiencies with the return envelopes. These findings highlight potential adverse impacts of expanded vote by mail on certain groups.

Enrico CantoniUniversity of Bologna2020
Usability & Accessibility Academic Papers

Cantoni examines the effect of voting costs - specifically distance to a polling location - on ballots cast. He finds that small increases in distance to a polling location reduce ballots cast. He also finds that during non-presidential elections, these effects are three times larger in high-minority areas than in low-minority areas.