Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

478 Resources

U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence, Center for Tech and Civic Life2026
Workforce Tools

This resource provides an online application template that election officials can use for recruiting prospective poll workers and gathering their information and qualifications. It allows election administrators to effectively manage and track poll worker data, including availability, skills, and training.

Workforce Tools

This page contains materials created by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission to support election officials in recruiting, training and retaining poll workers. It contains powerpoint templates, customizable graphics, social media templates, and sample press releases for recruiting poll workers as well as links to EAC publications on the topic such as as the 2026 report "Election Worker Recruitment, Training, Retention, and Evaluation."

U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence, Center for Tech and Civic Life2026
Workforce Tools

This resource, published by the U.S. Alliance for Elections Excellence in collaboration with the Center for Civic Design and the Elections Group, provides workbooks and templates for election officials to revise or build poll worker manuals from scratch. This toolkit is for anyone writing or updating their jurisdiction’s poll worker manuals.

U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence, Center for Tech and Civic Life2026
Workforce Tools

This resource contains powerpoint templates for creating bite-sized checklists for election day tasks. The checklists can be printed so that poll workers can carry the checklists as they move around the polling place.

Jennifer Gaudette, Mac LockhartYale University2026
Voter Trust Briefs

Article summarizing how short-form, low-budget vertical videos can be used by election officials to improve voter trust.

Cheryl Boudreau, Jennifer Gaudette, Thad Kousser, Seth J. Hill, Mackenzie Lockhart, Laura Uribe Yale University2026
Voter Trust Academic Papers

Paper sharing the results of three studies exploring the effectiveness of earned and paid media, federal vs state elected officials, and videos vs static images to convey trusted election information.

Samuel Baltz, Fernanda Gonzalez, Kevin Guo, and Charles Stewart III2025
Audits & Validating Elections Academic Papers

This paper provides an empirical analysis of 2020 election audits showing very small changes in presidential vote counts across audited jurisdictions and contest types.

Maryland General Assembly, Department of Legislative Services2025
Audits & Validating Elections Reports

This report analyzes another Maryland risk limiting audit (RLA) bill, including audit models, local board impacts, and references to practical RLA research.

Lisa Schur, Whitney Quesenbery Michelle Bishop, Misty Crooks, Mason Ameri, Douglas KruseCenter for Civic Design2025
Usability & Accessibility Reports

In this report, authors analyze evidence on voting difficulties, potential solutions, and ideas for a new center - the Center on Disability and Voting - from data using surveys, focus groups, and interviews with key stakeholders.

Whitney Quesenbery, Sharon LaskowskiNational Institute of Standards2025
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report explores the legibility and readability of summary ballots printed by ballot marking devices and the ability of optical character recognition (OCR) applications commonly to voice (read) summary ballots. The report identifies typographic elements that might make it easier to read a ballot visually, the feasibility of using OCR to allow blind or low vision voters to hear their ballot read accurately, and whether there is a relationship between the design elements that support both visual and OCR-assisted reading.

Cheryl Boudreau, Jennifer Gaudette, Thad Kousser, Seth J. Hill, Mackenzie Lockhart, Laura Uribe2025
Voter Trust Academic Papers

Three experiments about election official messaging are summarized, which:(a) compare the impact of messages conveyed through earned versus paid media; (b) ask whether Americans are more responsive to messages from federal or from state election officials; (c) explore the impact of videos and static visuals.

Laura Uribe, Jennifer Gaudette, Thad Kousser2025
Voter Trust Academic Papers

The authors conducted a nationally representative survey of 3,038 eligible voters with 999 self-identifying as disabled. The findings reveal voters with disabilities expressed lower confidence in the accuracy of their votes being counted. Voting by mail instilled greater confidence in voters with disabilities with nearly 12 percent more of them opting for this method. Trust levels varied within disability categories with Democratic respondents with disabilities displaying higher trust in election accuracy.