Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

478 Resources

Sharif Amlani, Samuel CollittUniversity of California, Davis2022
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

The research finds that counties that moved to send registered voters mail-in ballots ahead of Election Day experienced 2.6 percent higher turnout compared to counties that made no change, although lesser reforms may have hindered turnout. Additionally no evidence is found that making voting by mail easier conferred a partisan advantage.

Eric McGhee, Jennifer Paluch, Mindy Romero2022
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

These results suggest that making it easier to vote by mail—especially mailing every voter a ballot—generally does increase turnout, both before and during the 2020 election. By contrast, the same policies do not have robust partisan effects, and in many models, they tilt the results in a more Republican direction.

Alauna C. Safarpour, Michael J. HanmerUniversity of Maryland, College Park2022
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

The research finds that information about possible coronavirus exposures decreases comfort with voting in-person yet does not increase comfort with voting by mail.

John V. Kane, Jason Barabas2022
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

Drawing on a large survey of validated Florida voters, including those who regularly vote by mail, the research finds that retrospective and prospective misreporting of vote method prior to the 2020 General Election was driven primarily by support for Trump. The president’s supporters who were most politically aware were most likely to disavow their own voting by mail and misreport their anticipated vote method in the November election.

Joshua D. Clinton, John Lapinski, Sarah Lentz, Stephen Pettigrew2022
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

Using surveys of registered voters conducted in April and May 2020 designed to assess the support for various electoral reforms, the research shows that the overall support for expanding VBM in April 2020 falls sharply after just six weeks because Republicans became less worried about catching COVID-19, and unconcerned Republicans became far more opposed to VBM. These differences not only persisted, but actually increased even further between May and Election Day according to a survey done using a different methodology in November 2020.

Harvard Kennedy School, Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation2022
Voting by Mail Issue Briefs

This brief studies trends in mail ballot rejection rates in 2020 compared to previous years and how different factors, including sets of policies and policy changes, the political environment, and voter outreach, may have contributed to these changes in an extraordinary election year. Authors note potential areas of further study to better understand how voters casting their ballots by mail can ensure their votes are counted.

Office of the Washington State Auditor2022
Voting by Mail Reports

This report, issued by the Office of the State Auditor, summarizes a statistical analysis of ballots submitted in the Washington 2020 general elections, with an emphasis on understanding common reasons and predictors of ballot rejection. Its findings point to the county where a ballot was cast as being the most significant variable related to ballot rejection. The report concludes with recommendations for the state aimed at reducing ballot rejections.

Sutherland Institute2022
Voting by Mail Reports

This report seeks to inform discourse surrounding the implementation and impacts of vote by mail (VBM) policies by evaluating modern use-cases. Authors examine the history of VBM policies, the landscape of current research on VBM and analyze the use of VBM in Utah as a caste study. Report findings indicate that, when implemented well, VBM is a secure and successful means of casting a ballot

Nicholas D. Bernardo, Gretchen A. MachtUniversity of Rhode Island2022
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper challenges the HAVA minimum of one ADA-compliant device per polling location as insufficient and recommends that local election officials determine the number of accessible devices based on the proportion of voters with disabilities in their jurisdiction.

Ihaab Syed, Michelle Bishop, Sarah Brannon, Erika Hudson, Kristen Lee2022
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

In this paper, authors provide recommendations from disability voting rights advocates on how to improve the physical accessibility of polling locations and the usability of accessible voting equipment.

Adam Schmidt, Laura A. AlbertUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison2022
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper employs discrete-event simulation to model Milwaukee's in-person voting system during COVID-19. It reveals that poll worker shortages, social distancing measures, and PPE requirements can lead to very long voter wait times. The evaluation considers various design strategies to reduce pandemic-related effects, such as adding check-in locations, expanding early voting, and preventing the consolidation of polling sites.

Joshua D. HostetterThe Citadel2022
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

Hostetter examines whether the use of electronic poll books affects voter wait times, finding mixed results that depend on context, including photo ID requirements and precinct demographics.