Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

478 Resources

Rachel Lawless, Karen Hoyt-StewartVirginia Department of Elections2022
Audits & Validating Elections Reports

This report outlines Virginia's 2022 risk limiting audit process, results, observations, and recommendations for future audits.

Audits & Validating Elections Reports

This report provides practical guidance for conducting tabulation audits, with discussion of audit methods and links to risk limiting audit resources.

Lisa Schur, Douglas Kruse, Rutgers University, Mason AmeriU.S. Election Assistance Commission2022
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report highlights key trends in voter turnout among voters with disabilities in the 2022 elections. Authors note an increase in turnout among these voters compared to the 2018 midterms, especially in states with expanded vote by mail policies. However, approx. 14% of voters with disabilities reported some difficulties voting.

Lisa Schur, Mason AmeriRutgers University2022
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report summarizes the findings of a 2022 national survey of eligible voters with and without disabilities to understand the role of the internet in accessing voting information. Topics covered include computer and internet use, sources of information on the voting process used in 2020, and accessibility of information sources, among other topics.

Kerrianne E. Buchanan, Kevin C. Mangold Sharon J. LaskowskiNational Institute of Standards2022
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report examines barriers that prevent voters with disabilities from voting privately and independently. The report recommends several actions to overcome these barriers, including improving the accessibility of voting information and access to accessible voting technology, and integrating the disability community into all aspects of voting, among other things.

Jacob M. Grumbach, Charlotte Hill2022
Usability & Accessibility Academic Papers

In this paper, authors examine the impact of same day registration (SDR) policies on younger voters. They find that SDR disproportionately increases turnout among individuals aged 18–24 and is especially pronounced in presidential elections. The effects of early voting and other reforms are smaller and do not consistently vary by age.

Robynn Kuhlmann, Daniel C. Lewis2022
Usability & Accessibility Academic Papers

Authors examine the effects of state election administration laws on voter turnout at the state and individual levels for people with disabilities and compare them to that of the non-disabled population. They find that convenience voting reforms such as same-day registration and election-day registration boost turnout for both populations while all mail elections decrease the turnout gap between people with disabilities and the non-disabled.

Jean Schroedel, Melissa Rogers, Joseph Dietrich, Savannah Johnston, Aaron Berg2022
Usability & Accessibility Academic Papers

In this article, authors analyze on-site early voting locations on two reservations in Nevada. They find that on-site early voting substantially increased voter turnout in the general election on the reservations studied. These findings support providing convenient locations and longer periods to cast a ballot increases voter turnout.

Enrijeta Shino, Daniel A. Smith, Mara Suttmann-Lea2022
Usability & Accessibility Voting by Mail Academic Papers

Authors use official statewide voter file and mail-in ballot data from the 2018 midterm election in Georgia to test whether certain voters are more likely to cast a mail ballot that does not count. In their analysis, authors distinguish between ballots rejected for lateness and those rejected for a mistake on the return envelope, finding that newly registered, young, and minority voters have higher rejection rates compared with their counterparts.

Benjamin A. Lyons, Kaitlyn S. WorkmanUniversity of Utah2022
Voter Trust Academic Papers

This research finds that explicit cues about rigged voting machines increase belief in such theories, especially when the cues target the opposing political party. Explicit cues also decrease confidence in elections regardless of the targeted party, but they have no effect on satisfaction with democracy or support for election security funding.

Charles Stewart IIIMassachusetts Institute of Technology2022
Voter Trust Academic Papers

The past two decades have seen a decline in trust in American elections that has primarily been driven by a slow but steady decline in trust among Republicans. Surprisingly, the increased polarization in trust most recently has been due more to Democrats suddenly becoming more trusting. Election officials must continue to try to overcome attacks on trust in the system, but it is unclear how long they can sustain the legal system guaranteeing free and fair elections without broad-based public trust in how elections are administered.

Cassidy Reller, Anthony Anderson, Thad KousserUniversity of California San Diego2022
Voter Trust Academic Papers

This research finds even in the absence of elite claims of vote fraud, authors see strong and immediate shifts in mass views. Once the results became clear, those who supported the losing side became significantly less likely to trust that votes were counted correctly or to be satisfied with the election process, while trust and support for the process rose from pre-to post-election for voters on the winning side.