Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

116 Resources

Stephanie Singer, Neal McBurnettVerified Voting2018
Audits & Validating Elections Reports

This report summarizes the Orange County Registrar of Voters pilot audit of all countywide election contests.

Lisa Schur, Douglas KruseRutgers University2018
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report highlights key trends in voter turnout among voters with disabilities in the 2018 elections. Authors note an increase in turnout among these voters compared to the 2014 midterms. They found that employed voters with disabilities were just as likely to vote as employed voters without disabilities, suggesting a link between employment and political participation.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine2018
Audits & Validating Elections Academic Papers

This paper, recommends voter-verifiable paper ballots and routine audits of paper ballots to verify tabulation and detect compromised systems.

Bernard L. FragaIndiana University2018
Usability & Accessibility Books

In The Turnout Gap, Fraga provides a comprehensive analysis of the causes and consequences of racial and ethnic disparities in voter turnout. Examining voting for Whites, African Americans, Latinos, and Asian Americans from the 1800s to the present, Fraga documents persistent gaps in turnout and shows that elections are increasingly unrepresentative of the wishes of all Americans.

Audits & Validating Elections Reports

This report describes Colorado's online risk limiting audits tool, risk-limit concepts, and county-facing implementation details after statewide adoption.

American Statistical Association2018
Audits & Validating Elections Academic Papers

This paper sets out principles for reliable post-election tabulation audits, including voter-verifiable paper records, transparency, ballot protection, and statistical rigor.

Philip B. StarkUniversity of California, Berkeley2018
Audits & Validating Elections Academic Papers

In this paper, authors provide a concise policy-oriented introduction to evidence-based elections and risk limiting audits, including legislative principles and implementation considerations.

Ronald L. RivestMIT Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory2017
Audits & Validating Elections Academic Papers

In this paper, authors explain what risk limiting audits do and do not verify, emphasizing paper-ballot examination and the distinction between outcome verification and other election processes.

Kimberly R Huyser, Gabriel R Sanchez, Edward D Vargas2017
Usability & Accessibility Academic Papers

In this paper, authors compare American Indian (AI) and Alaska Native (AN) registration, voting, and overall civic engagement to other racial and ethnic groups. They find several key socio-economic status indicators predicting civic and political engagement uniquely for AI/ANs, but they are not consistently significant across all years or all types of political participation.

Ronald L. Rivest, Philip B. Stark, Zara Perumal2017
Audits & Validating Elections Academic Papers

This paper explores voting-rule design choices that can reduce audit burden and improve auditability, with implications for post-election verification.

Lisa Schur, Douglas Kruse, Meera Adya2017
Usability & Accessibility Workforce Academic Papers

In this paper, authors explore the role of polling place inaccessibility in contributing to the voting gap among people with disabilities. Authors found that, in the 2012 elections, the turnout gap was reduced but not eliminated and that 30% of voters with disabilities experienced difficulties voting. These findings support the claim that difficulties voting depress voter turnout.

Sharon Laskowski, Shaneé Dawkins, Whitney Quesenbery, Nancy Frishberg, Pam Smith, Keith InstoneCenter for Civic Design2017
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report proposes principles and guidelines for the design and development of remote ballot marking systems based on a review of current literature and existing standards for voting systems and accessibility and input from experts in the field. The principles support the development of systems that are usable, accessible, and secure, addressing the perceived conflict accessibility and strong election integrity.