Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

155 Resources

The Council of State Governments, Overseas Voting Initiative2020
Voting by Mail Reports

Since the passage of the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment of 2009, many technology solutions have been developed to help UOCAVA voters request, receive and return their ballots. This report examines the preliminary and current landscape of these technology solutions and identifies barriers to ensuring their sustainability. The report also identifies areas of further research related to emerging UOCAVA balloting solutions.

Lisa Schur, Douglas KruseRutgers University2020
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report summarizes projections of how many people with disabilities would be eligible to vote in the November 2020 elections, using data from the Census Bureau’s 2014-2018 American Community Survey combined with Census Bureau population projections for 2020-2021. The report breaks down key demographic characteristics of eligible voters with disabilities.

Michael Barber, John B. Holbein2020
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

Examining two states that have conducted a staggered rollout of mandatory vote-by-mail (Washington and Utah), this research finds that mandatory vote-by-mail slightly increases voter turnout but has no effect on election outcomes at various levels of government.

Lisa A. BryantCalifornia State University2020
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

In this research, voters were randomly assigned to either an in-person or absentee voting condition. Participants assigned to the absentee condition expressed lower levels of confidence that their votes would be counted correctly than those assigned to the in-person voting condition. Voters who had to ask for assistance during the experiment also reported lower levels of confidence.

Courtney L. Juelich, Joseph A. CollThe University of Iowa2020
Usability & Accessibility Academic Papers

This paper examines the factors underlying low turnout rates among youth voters. Using the 2004 - 2016 Current Population Survey, authors find that restrictive environments disproportionately hurt young voters by decreasing the probability they turn out by 16 percentage points, compared with older voters.

Daniel M. Thompson, Jennifer Wu, Jesse Yoder, Andrew B. HallStanford University2020
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

This research finds that expanding universal vote-by-mail has not dramatically advantaged either party historically.

Roxana Arjon, et al.2020
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

This study of California focuses on (1) vote-by-mail signature verification processes and (2) notice and remedy procedures for unverified signatures.

Lynn Baumeister, Alex Haraseyko, Whitney QuesenberyCenter for Civic Design2020
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report details the design and usability testing of an accessible ranked-choice voting ballot interface built to work for voters who are blind or very low vision, have limited or no use of their hands, or have cognitive or attention disabilities. Testing with participants with various disabilities found that no single design can be fully optimized for all modes, but a workable default is achievable.

Enrijeta Shino, Daniel A. SmithUniversity of North Florida2020
Usability & Accessibility Academic Papers

In this paper, authors analyze the targeted adoption of early in-person voting on public colleges and university campuses. Using data from the 2018 general election in Florida, authors find uneven effects of the policy reform on overall turnout, but consistent evidence that the adoption of on-campus early voting impacts the timing and volume of voter turnout among this group.

Andrew Menger, Robert M. Stein2020
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

This research tests four explanations for how vote by mail voters choose to return their ballot, including the social rewards of voting, the costs of voting, trust in U.S. Postal Service and a preference to cast a ballot after campaigning ends. It finds supporting evidence for each explanation conditioned by prior history of voting.

Whitney QuesenberyCenter for Civic Design2019
Usability & Accessibility Reports

In 2015, the Center for Civic Design outlined six priority areas for improving the usability and accessibility of election systems. This report details progress toward incorporating these priorities into the VVSG 2.0. It also details related efforts by election community stakeholders to implement these priorities.

Christopher Patten, Dana ChisnellCenter for Civic Design2019
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report draws on ethnographic interviews with naturalized U.S. citizens to explore why so eligible immigrant voters don't participate in elections. Researchers found that voting barriers go beyond language, including distrust of government, the overwhelming logistics of adjusting to life in the U.S., and gaps in civic literacy. The report offers practical recommendations for election officials to remove barriers to new citizens participating in civic life.