Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

155 Resources

Courtney L. Juelich, Joseph A. CollThe University of Iowa2020
Usability & Accessibility Academic Papers

This paper examines the factors underlying low turnout rates among youth voters. Using the 2004 - 2016 Current Population Survey, authors find that restrictive environments disproportionately hurt young voters by decreasing the probability they turn out by 16 percentage points, compared with older voters.

Daniel M. Thompson, Jennifer Wu, Jesse Yoder, Andrew B. HallStanford University2020
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

This research finds that expanding universal vote-by-mail has not dramatically advantaged either party historically.

Roxana Arjon, et al.2020
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

This study of California focuses on (1) vote-by-mail signature verification processes and (2) notice and remedy procedures for unverified signatures.

Lynn Baumeister, Alex Haraseyko, Whitney QuesenberyCenter for Civic Design2020
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report details the design and usability testing of an accessible ranked-choice voting ballot interface built to work for voters who are blind or very low vision, have limited or no use of their hands, or have cognitive or attention disabilities. Testing with participants with various disabilities found that no single design can be fully optimized for all modes, but a workable default is achievable.

Enrijeta Shino, Daniel A. SmithUniversity of North Florida2020
Usability & Accessibility Academic Papers

In this paper, authors analyze the targeted adoption of early in-person voting on public colleges and university campuses. Using data from the 2018 general election in Florida, authors find uneven effects of the policy reform on overall turnout, but consistent evidence that the adoption of on-campus early voting impacts the timing and volume of voter turnout among this group.

Andrew Menger, Robert M. Stein2020
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

This research tests four explanations for how vote by mail voters choose to return their ballot, including the social rewards of voting, the costs of voting, trust in U.S. Postal Service and a preference to cast a ballot after campaigning ends. It finds supporting evidence for each explanation conditioned by prior history of voting.

Jenny Blessing, Julian Gomez, McCoy Patiño, Tran Nguyen2020
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

The research finds that online voter registration systems in some states have vulnerabilities that allow adversaries to alter or effectively prevent a voter's registration. The analysis additionally finds that ballot tracking systems raise serious privacy questions surrounding ease of access to voter data.

Lisa Schur, Douglas KruseU.S. Election Assistance Commission2020
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report highlights key trends in voter turnout among voters with disabilities in the 2020 election. Authors note a significant increase in turnout among these voters compared to the 2016 general election, reducing the turnout gap with voters without disabilities to 5.7 percentage points. However, approx. 11% of voters with disabilities reported some difficulties voting.

David Cottrell, Michael C. Herron, Daniel A. Smith2020
Usability & Accessibility Academic Papers

In this paper, authors examine whether use of vote by mail exacerbates existing inequalities in mail-in ballot rejection rates. They find that younger voters were more likely to have their vote by mail ballot rejected than older voters due to lack of timeliness or deficiencies with the return envelopes. These findings highlight potential adverse impacts of expanded vote by mail on certain groups.

William McGuire, Benjamin Gonzalez O’Brien, Katherine E. Baird, Benjamin Corbett, Loren Collingwood2020
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

The research finds that drop boxes have a positive effect on voter turnout and that decreasing the distance to these boxes can lead to an increased likelihood of voting.

Christopher Patten, Dana ChisnellCenter for Civic Design2019
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report draws on ethnographic interviews with naturalized U.S. citizens to explore why so eligible immigrant voters don't participate in elections. Researchers found that voting barriers go beyond language, including distrust of government, the overwhelming logistics of adjusting to life in the U.S., and gaps in civic literacy. The report offers practical recommendations for election officials to remove barriers to new citizens participating in civic life.

Rebekah Herrick, Jeanette Morehouse MendezOklahoma State University2019
Usability & Accessibility Academic Papers

In this paper, authors estimate the effects of American Indians' group consciousness on their political interests, voting rates, and support for co-ethnic candidates. They find that American Indians who have higher levels of group consciousness are more likely to support co-ethnic candidates, but little effect on their political participation and interest.