Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

182 Resources

Philip Kortum, Michael D. Byrne2016
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper reviews how voting systems that are not designed to support human perceptual and cognitive limitations pose a serious threat to accurate ballot recording, and have almost certainly altered election outcomes in the United States.

Peter Miller, Sierra PowellUniversity of Pennsylvania2016
Usability & Accessibility Academic Papers

Miller and Powell examine the extent to which people with disabilities vote in person or utilize convenience voting reforms relative to voters without disabilities. They find that voters with a disability are significantly less likely to vote but are more likely to vote by mail ballot. They also examine the efficacy of several additional reforms such as early voting in increasing turnout among voters with disabilities.

U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Disability Rights Section2016
In-Person Voting Tools

This report provides federal guidance on accessibility standards for polling places under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the primary federal framework for polling place design.

Brian Amos, Daniel A. Smith, Casey Ste. ClaireUniversity of Florida2016
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper finds that Hispanic voters were more likely to abstain from voting after being reassigned to a different Election Day polling place than voters in other racial groups.

Lisa Schur, Douglas KruseRutgers University2016
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report summarizes projections of how many people with disabilities would be eligible to vote in the November 2016 elections, using data from the Census Bureau’s 2010-2014 American Community Survey combined with Census Bureau population projections. The report breaks down key demographic characteristics of eligible voters with disabilities.

Kathryn Summers, Whitney Quesenbery, Amy Pointer2016
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This paper describes a two-pronged effort to increase the accessibility and inclusivity of the vote by mail process for voters who are blind, have low vision, or low dexterity and voters who read at Basic or Below Basic levels. These efforts focus on the accessibility and usability of Maryland's online ballot marking tool and revising paper instructions and envelopes in vote-by-mail packages.

Michael C. Herron, Daniel A. Smith2016
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper examines how precinct-level resources such as staffing, equipment, and voter arrival patterns influence voter wait times, revealing that resource allocation decisions are a key factor in long lines.

Lisa Schur, Douglas KruseRutgers University2016
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report highlights key trends in voter turnout among voters with disabilities in the 2016 elections. Authors note continuing gaps in registration and turnout of voters with disabilities compared to that of voters without disabilities. Voters with disabilities were also more likely to vote by mail before election day, reflecting the mobility problems faced by some voters with disabilities.

Whitney Quesenbery, Jennifer SuttonCenter for Civic Design2016
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This white paper reviews the types of personal assistive technology (AT) that voters might use in the polling place. It focuses on technologies that are either currently in common use, or in early stages of development and may be widely available in the future.

Claudia Ziegler Acemyan, Philip KortumRice University2016
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper finds that the placement and configuration of voting booths, including the spacing between machines and the use of dividers, significantly increase levels of anticipated voting system usability and voter confidence.

Charles Stewart IIICaltech-MIT Voting Technology Project2015
In-Person Voting Reports

This report provides guidance for local election officials on how to collect and use data to manage polling place resources more effectively, including diagnosing congestion and allocating voting machines and poll workers.

Mark PelczarskiCaltech-MIT Voting Technology Project2015
In-Person Voting Tools

This simulation tool estimates potential voter wait times based on projected turnout, average time to vote for a specific ballot and equipment, and average check-in time per voter. It helps officials understand how different combinations of resources and voter loads translate into line lengths.