Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

118 Resources

Audits & Validating Elections Reports

This report discuss Colorado's risk-limiting audit pilot in Arapahoe County including the audit design, scanner/ballot procedures, and lessons for statewide implementation.

Maryland State Board of Elections2016
Audits & Validating Elections Reports

This reports details Maryland's pilot use of ballot-level images to audit tabulated results after adopting a new statewide voting system.

Virginia Department of Elections2015
Voting by Mail Reports

In 2014, the Virginia General Assembly established a working group to provide instructions, procedures, services, a security assessment, and security measures for the secure return by electronic means of voted absentee military- overseas ballots from uniformed-service voters outside of the United States. This report details the finding and work of the working group's first convening in 2015.

Barry C. Burden, Brian J. Gaines2015
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

This paper explores the use of absentee and early voting in U.S. elections. Authors state that absentee voting is often marginally more convenient and might be less expensive to administer, but it also carries unique costs in terms of ballot insecurity, higher odds of error and fraud, and a concomitant reduction in public confidence. They assert that states intent on making the act of voting easier should prefer in-person early voting to absentee voting, while continuing to focus on improving the experience of Election Day voting.

Alan S. Gerber, Gregory A. Huber, & Seth J. Hill2013
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

This paper is an early quasi-experimental study of the effects of rolling out all-mail elections in Washington State. In contrast with similar ear studies conducted using Oregon data, this study finds that the Washington roll-out led to turnout increases in the range of 2-to-4 percentage points, and that the effects were focused on otherwise low-propensity voters.

Charles Stewart III2010
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

Extending the "lost-votes" concept developed by the Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project, this law review article estimates the number of mail ballots "lost" in the 2008 election through problems with ballot transmission and ballot rejections.

Thad Kousser and Megan Mullin2007
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

This paper is an early experimental study of the effects of vote-by-mail elections. Using individual voter data from California, the authors find that as-if random assignment of voters to cast mail ballots reduces turnout in state elections, although they do find positive turnout effect for special local elections.

John C. FortierAmerican Enterprise Institute2006
Voting by Mail In-Person Voting Reports

An early assessment of the growing trend of states expanding the use of absentee and early in-person voting in elections.

Adam J. Berinsky, Nancy Burns, and Michael W. Traugott2001
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

A foundational study of the early consequences of all vote-by-mail elections. This paper studies individual-level voter turnout data in Oregon and concludes that all vote-by-mail elections increase turnout by retaining voters in the electorate, rather than by allowing more low-propensity voters to participate.

Jeffrey A. Karp & Susan A. Banducci2000
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

Authors examine the question of whether or not conducting elections entirely through the mail rather than at the traditional polling place increases participation. Using election data from Oregon, the authors examine whether mail-based elections increase turnout in both local and statewide elections. The paper uses precinct-level data merged with census data. It finds that, while all-mail elections tend to produce higher turnout, the most significant increases occur in low-stimulus elections, such as local elections or primaries, where turnout is usually low. The increase in turnout, however, is not uniform across demographic groups. Voting only by mail is likely to increase turnout among those who are already predisposed to vote, such as those with higher socioeconomic status. This is one of the early foundational studies of voting by mail.