Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

118 Resources

Philip B. StarkUniversity of California, Berkeley2022
Audits & Validating Elections Academic Papers

In this paper, authors present ALPHA, a flexible risk limiting audit method that can handle sampling without replacement and stratification while learning from audited ballots.

Harvard Kennedy School, Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation2022
Voting by Mail Issue Briefs

This brief studies trends in mail ballot rejection rates in 2020 compared to previous years and how different factors, including sets of policies and policy changes, the political environment, and voter outreach, may have contributed to these changes in an extraordinary election year. Authors note potential areas of further study to better understand how voters casting their ballots by mail can ensure their votes are counted.

Paul S. Herrnson, Michael J. Hanmer, Matthew Weil, Wren Orey2022
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

Joshua D. Clinton, John Lapinski, Sarah Lentz, Stephen Pettigrew2022
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

Using surveys of registered voters conducted in April and May 2020 designed to assess the support for various electoral reforms, the research shows that the overall support for expanding VBM in April 2020 falls sharply after just six weeks because Republicans became less worried about catching COVID-19, and unconcerned Republicans became far more opposed to VBM. These differences not only persisted, but actually increased even further between May and Election Day according to a survey done using a different methodology in November 2020.

Audits & Validating Elections Reports

This report provides practical guidance for conducting tabulation audits, with discussion of audit methods and links to risk limiting audit resources.

Lonna Rae Atkeson, Wendy L. Hansen, Maggie Toulouse Oliver, Cherie D. Maestas, Eric C. Wiemer2022
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

While the evidence is clear that 2020 voters shifted away from Election Day voting in favor of vote-by-mail and early voting, very is known about how health risk versus party polarization around risk assessment influenced how and when to vote. The research finds that age and party were large factors in vote mode decisions in 2020, but not in 2016 or 2018.

John V. Kane, Jason Barabas2022
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

Drawing on a large survey of validated Florida voters, including those who regularly vote by mail, the research finds that retrospective and prospective misreporting of vote method prior to the 2020 General Election was driven primarily by support for Trump. The president’s supporters who were most politically aware were most likely to disavow their own voting by mail and misreport their anticipated vote method in the November election.

Rachel Lawless, Karen Hoyt-StewartVirginia Department of Elections2022
Audits & Validating Elections Reports

This report outlines Virginia's 2022 risk limiting audit process, results, observations, and recommendations for future audits.

Enrijeta Shino, Daniel A. Smith2022
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

This research finds that voters with greater general political knowledge are more likely to vote early, and those with low political knowledge are more likely to wait until Election Day to cast their ballot.

Alauna C. Safarpour, Michael J. HanmerUniversity of Maryland, College Park2022
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

The research finds that information about possible coronavirus exposures decreases comfort with voting in-person yet does not increase comfort with voting by mail.

The Carter Center2022
Audits & Validating Elections Reports

This report describes the Carter Center's observation of the 2022 risk limiting audit conducted in Georgia.

Sutherland Institute2022
Voting by Mail Reports

This report seeks to inform discourse surrounding the implementation and impacts of vote by mail (VBM) policies by evaluating modern use-cases. Authors examine the history of VBM policies, the landscape of current research on VBM and analyze the use of VBM in Utah as a caste study. Report findings indicate that, when implemented well, VBM is a secure and successful means of casting a ballot