Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

118 Resources

Enrijeta Shino, Daniel A. Smith2022
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

This research finds that voters with greater general political knowledge are more likely to vote early, and those with low political knowledge are more likely to wait until Election Day to cast their ballot.

Alauna C. Safarpour, Michael J. HanmerUniversity of Maryland, College Park2022
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

The research finds that information about possible coronavirus exposures decreases comfort with voting in-person yet does not increase comfort with voting by mail.

Sutherland Institute2022
Voting by Mail Reports

This report seeks to inform discourse surrounding the implementation and impacts of vote by mail (VBM) policies by evaluating modern use-cases. Authors examine the history of VBM policies, the landscape of current research on VBM and analyze the use of VBM in Utah as a caste study. Report findings indicate that, when implemented well, VBM is a secure and successful means of casting a ballot

The Carter Center2022
Audits & Validating Elections Reports

This report describes the Carter Center's observation of the 2022 risk limiting audit conducted in Georgia.

Enrijeta Shino, Daniel A. Smith, Mara Suttmann-Lea2022
Usability & Accessibility Voting by Mail Academic Papers

Authors use official statewide voter file and mail-in ballot data from the 2018 midterm election in Georgia to test whether certain voters are more likely to cast a mail ballot that does not count. In their analysis, authors distinguish between ballots rejected for lateness and those rejected for a mistake on the return envelope, finding that newly registered, young, and minority voters have higher rejection rates compared with their counterparts.

Eric McGhee, Jennifer Paluch, Mindy Romero2022
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

These results suggest that making it easier to vote by mail—especially mailing every voter a ballot—generally does increase turnout, both before and during the 2020 election. By contrast, the same policies do not have robust partisan effects, and in many models, they tilt the results in a more Republican direction.

Office of the Washington State Auditor2022
Voting by Mail Reports

This report, issued by the Office of the State Auditor, summarizes a statistical analysis of ballots submitted in the Washington 2020 general elections, with an emphasis on understanding common reasons and predictors of ballot rejection. Its findings point to the county where a ballot was cast as being the most significant variable related to ballot rejection. The report concludes with recommendations for the state aimed at reducing ballot rejections.

The Carter Center2022
Audits & Validating Elections Reports

Explains risk limiting audits (RLA) for observers, including steps, what observers should monitor, and how RLAs compare with other post-election checks.

Sharif Amlani, Samuel CollittUniversity of California, Davis2022
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

The research finds that counties that moved to send registered voters mail-in ballots ahead of Election Day experienced 2.6 percent higher turnout compared to counties that made no change, although lesser reforms may have hindered turnout. Additionally no evidence is found that making voting by mail easier conferred a partisan advantage.

Harvard Kennedy School, Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation2022
Voting by Mail Issue Briefs

This brief studies trends in mail ballot rejection rates in 2020 compared to previous years and how different factors, including sets of policies and policy changes, the political environment, and voter outreach, may have contributed to these changes in an extraordinary election year. Authors note potential areas of further study to better understand how voters casting their ballots by mail can ensure their votes are counted.

Philip B. StarkUniversity of California, Berkeley2022
Audits & Validating Elections Academic Papers

In this paper, authors present ALPHA, a flexible risk limiting audit method that can handle sampling without replacement and stratification while learning from audited ballots.

Paul S. Herrnson, Michael J. Hanmer, Matthew Weil, Wren Orey2022
Voting by Mail Academic Papers