Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

108 Resources

Philip Kortum, Michael D. Byrne, Julie WhitmoreRice University2020
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper proposes a two-part framework for evaluating ballot-marking device verification, finding that while most voters can detect errors when they check their ballot, most do not check their ballot in the first place.

Enrico CantoniUniversity of Bologna2020
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

In this paper, Cantoni Indicates that extending the distance to a polling place by a quarter mile decreases voter turnout by one to three percentage points, with a greater impact observed in areas with higher proportions of non-white voters.

Theodore T. Allen, Muer Yang, Shijie Huang, Olivia K. Hernandez2020
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

In this paper, authors generate voter wait-time estimates using an indifference-zone generalized binary search method to optimize and determine resource allocation, such as electronic poll books and voting machines, to reduce wait times.

Nathaniel Persily, Charles Stewart IIIStanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project2020
In-Person Voting Tools

This resource is a curated hub of tools developed by university researchers and the civic tech community to help election officials manage in-person polling place operations, including resource allocation, queue management, capacity planning with social distancing, and poll worker management.

John Kuk, Zoltan Hajnal, Nazita Lajevardi2020
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

In this paper, authors find that strict voter ID laws impose a disproportionate burden on minority voters and have significant negative effects on turnout among racial and ethnic minority groups.

Matthew Bernhard, Allison McDonald, Henry Meng, Jensen Hwa, Nakul Bajaj, Kevin Chang, J. Alex HaldermanUniversity of Michigan2020
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

In this paper, authors test whether voters can detect malicious manipulation of ballot-marking devices, finding low detection rates and showing that signage and poll worker prompts can modestly improve verification rates.

Lisa A. BryantCalifornia State University2020
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper compares in-person versus absentee voting, finding that voters randomly assigned to in-person voting reported significantly higher levels of voter confidence than those assigned to absentee voting.

Bridgett A. KingAuburn University2020
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

Using the Survey of the Performance of American Elections, authors find that wait times have a significant negative effect on voter confidence, as do challenges with voting equipment and voter registration irregularities.

Andrew W. Appel, Richard A. DeMillo, Philip B. StarkPrinceton University2020
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

In this paper, authors argue that ballot-marking devices cannot ensure that the paper ballot accurately reflects the voter's choices because voters rarely verify the printed ballot carefully enough to detect errors or manipulation.

Charles Stewart IIIStanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project2020
In-Person Voting Tools

This tool can be used to estimate outside queue capacity needs, average voter wait times, and the number of voters who will wait too long, given social distancing constraints that limit the number of people allowed inside a polling place at one time.

Hannah Klain, Kevin Morris, Max Feldman, Rebecca AyalaBrennan Center for Justice2020
In-Person Voting Reports

This report documents racial disparities in Election Day wait times, finding that voters in minority precincts face systematically longer waits than those in majority-white precincts.

In-Person Voting Tools

This tool provides eight key questions election officials should consider when designing or reviewing a ballot. These questions focus on layout, instructions, typography, and formatting to help minimize voter errors and undervoting.