Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

147 Resources

Audits & Validating Elections Reports

This report provides practical guidance for conducting tabulation audits, with discussion of audit methods and links to risk limiting audit resources.

Nicholas D. Bernardo, Gretchen A. MachtUniversity of Rhode Island2022
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper challenges the HAVA minimum of one ADA-compliant device per polling location as insufficient and recommends that local election officials determine the number of accessible devices based on the proportion of voters with disabilities in their jurisdiction.

Adam P. SchmidtUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison2022
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

In this PhD dissertation, Schmidt introduces optimization and simulation models to support the design and operation of resilient in-person election voting systems. Three core contributions: (1) a discrete-event simulation of pandemic-resilient polling-place design, with a case study of Milwaukee, WI; (2) the Polling Location Consolidation Problem (PLCP), an integer programming model applied to Richland County, SC; and (3) an optimization model for ballot drop box siting in Milwaukee.

Rachel Lawless, Karen Hoyt-StewartVirginia Department of Elections2022
Audits & Validating Elections Reports

This report outlines Virginia's 2022 risk limiting audit process, results, observations, and recommendations for future audits.

Nicholas D. BernardoUniversity of Rhode Island2022
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

In this PhD dissertation, Bernardo develops a simulation-based framework to examine how in-person election system conditions affect voter wait times and throughput. Three core contributions: (1) observational time studies of voting operations across multiple Rhode Island elections to calibrate arrival-rate and service-time parameters; (2) discrete-event simulation models of polling-place operations under varying equipment types, layouts, and resource levels; and (3) application of the models to COVID-19 social-distancing scenarios, precinct-consolidation decisions, and minimum requirements for accessible equipment.

The Carter Center2022
Audits & Validating Elections Reports

This report describes the Carter Center's observation of the 2022 risk limiting audit conducted in Georgia.

Joshua D. HostetterThe Citadel2022
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

Hostetter examines whether the use of electronic poll books affects voter wait times, finding mixed results that depend on context, including photo ID requirements and precinct demographics.

The Carter Center2022
Audits & Validating Elections Reports

Explains risk limiting audits (RLA) for observers, including steps, what observers should monitor, and how RLAs compare with other post-election checks.

R. Michael Alvarez, Jian Cao, Yimeng LiCalifornia Institute of Technology2021
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper explores how voting experiences and fraud perceptions influence voter confidence, revealing that negative voting experiences, particularly long wait times, are linked to decreased confidence and increased perceptions of fraud.

John Fortier and Charles Stewart IIIMIT Election Data and Science Lab/ American Enterprise Institute2021
In-Person Voting Reports

This report reviews multiple topics related to conducting the 2020 general election, including meeting the challenge of voting in person during the COVIS-19 pandemic.

Cynthia Chen, Arisa Sadeghpour, Matt Lamb2021
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

In this paper, authors analyze how transitioning to vote centers impacts voters' experiences, noting that inadequate implementation may result in longer waits and increased voter dissatisfaction.

Joshua D. Clinton, Nick Eubank, Adriane Fresh, Michael E. Shepherd2021
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper examines how changes in Election Day polling place locations affect voter turnout. The authors analyze voter behavior in three presidential elections in North Carolina (2008 - 2016), finding that these changes reduce Election Day voting on average, but that the reduction is offset by substitution into early voting.