Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

185 Resources

Philip Kortum, Michael D. Byrne2016
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper reviews how voting systems that are not designed to support human perceptual and cognitive limitations pose a serious threat to accurate ballot recording, and have almost certainly altered election outcomes in the United States.

Mark PelczarskiCaltech-MIT Voting Technology Project2015
In-Person Voting Tools

This simulation tool estimates potential voter wait times based on projected turnout, average time to vote for a specific ballot and equipment, and average check-in time per voter. It helps officials understand how different combinations of resources and voter loads translate into line lengths.

Stephen Graves, Rong YuanCaltech-MIT Voting Technology Project2015
In-Person Voting Tools

This tool uses queueing theory to calculate the minimum number of service stations (poll books, voting booths, etc.) at each step of the polling place process to meet a target maximum wait time. It offers both a web interface for simple models and a downloadable Excel spreadsheet for jurisdiction-wide planning across hundreds of polling places simultaneously.

Virginia Department of Elections2015
Voting by Mail Reports

In 2014, the Virginia General Assembly established a working group to provide instructions, procedures, services, a security assessment, and security measures for the secure return by electronic means of voted absentee military- overseas ballots from uniformed-service voters outside of the United States. This report details the finding and work of the working group's first convening in 2015.

Charles Stewart III, Stephen Ansolabehere2015
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper reviews evidence on the causes and consequences of long wait times at polling places, and discusses policy interventions that have been shown to reduce lines and improve the voter experience.

Barry C. Burden, Brian J. Gaines2015
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

This paper explores the use of absentee and early voting in U.S. elections. Authors state that absentee voting is often marginally more convenient and might be less expensive to administer, but it also carries unique costs in terms of ballot insecurity, higher odds of error and fraud, and a concomitant reduction in public confidence. They assert that states intent on making the act of voting easier should prefer in-person early voting to absentee voting, while continuing to focus on improving the experience of Election Day voting.

Charles Stewart III, Stephen Graves, Aaron Strauss, Mark PelczarskiCaltech-MIT Voting Technology Project2015
In-Person Voting Tools

This resource is an open-access election management toolkit with calculators and tools to help election officials plan polling place resources, minimize wait times, and optimize poll worker and equipment allocation.

Barry C. Burden, Jeffrey Milyo2015
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper analyzes the quantity and quality of poll workers, highlighting that performance, rather than numbers alone, is a key factor in voter satisfaction and the efficient conduct of elections.

Usability & Accessibility In-Person Voting Tools

This guide walks election officials through how to make election technologies such as online voter registration, polling place apps, and electronic poll books accessible to people with disabilities. It introduces the POUR principles as a framework for evaluating accessibility, recommends a layered testing approach for election systems, and points to free accessibility tools.

Charles Stewart IIICaltech-MIT Voting Technology Project2015
In-Person Voting Reports

This report provides guidance for local election officials on how to collect and use data to manage polling place resources more effectively, including diagnosing congestion and allocating voting machines and poll workers.

Alan S. Gerber, Gregory A. Huber, & Seth J. Hill2013
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

This paper is an early quasi-experimental study of the effects of rolling out all-mail elections in Washington State. In contrast with similar ear studies conducted using Oregon data, this study finds that the Washington roll-out led to turnout increases in the range of 2-to-4 percentage points, and that the effects were focused on otherwise low-propensity voters.

Charles Stewart III2010
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

Extending the "lost-votes" concept developed by the Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project, this law review article estimates the number of mail ballots "lost" in the 2008 election through problems with ballot transmission and ballot rejections.