Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

185 Resources

Jeronimo Cortina, Brandon RottinghausUniversity of Houston2019
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper analyzes how vote centers influence voter turnout in various election types in Texas, showing that their effect depends on the election context and voter demographics.

Conor M. Dowling, David Doherty, Seth J. Hill, Alan S. Gerber, Gregory A. Huber2019
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper finds that large numbers of voters do not perceive their ballots as secret and harbor doubts about the institution's ability to keep them private, with perceptions varying by voting method and polling place design.

Nicholas D. BernardoUniversity of Rhode Island2019
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

In this MS thesis, Bernardo investigates how ballot-length metrics (words, questions, selections, pages, sheets, bilingual status) affect voting errors during the 2018 Rhode Island midterm election. He uses logistic regression models that control for municipal- and precinct-level demographics to analyze machine-based, human-machine interaction, and ballot-marking errors. Bernardo finds that longer ballots and urban precincts significantly increase the odds of voting errors, with implications for ballot design and jurisdiction-level oversight.

James P. HoughtonUniversity of Rhode Island2019
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

In this MS thesis, Houghton develops a methodology to estimate voter arrival rates at polling stations using electronic poll book transaction logs. It includes service time observations collected through time studies during the 2018 Rhode Island midterm election across seven precincts. The study applies a Hidden Markov Model to infer voter arrival patterns from the check-in records. Finds that e-pollbook logs offer a scalable, less labor-intensive alternative to manual observation for estimating arrival rates.

Natalie Adona, Paul Gronke2018
In-Person Voting Reports

This report surveys the public's views on election administration and reform, examining what voters value most in the voting experience and which changes they believe would improve it.

Bridgett A. KingMIT Election Data + Science Lab2018
Voter Trust In-Person Voting Workforce Academic Papers

This research focuses on whether voters’ confidence is shaped by the racial or ethnic representation of poll workers and election staff.

Jacob Jaffe, Charles Stewart III, Jacob CoblentzCaltech-MIT Voting Technology Project2018
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

In this paper, authors develop models to estimate voter service times from voting machine log data, providing election officials with a scalable approach to analyze and improve polling place operations.

John C. Fortier, Charles Stewart III, Stephen Pettigrew, Matthew Weil, Tim HarperBipartisan Policy Center2018
In-Person Voting Reports

This report provides practical recommendations for reducing polling place wait times by improving line measurement and the management of polling place resources.

Loren Collingwood, William McGuire, Benjamin Gonzalez O’Brien, Katherine E. Baird, Sarah Hampson2018
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

In Washington, the research finds that distance to the closest ballot drop box increases one's probability of voting but primarily in off-year elections and primaries.

Center for Inclusive Democracy2018
In-Person Voting Tools

The Voting Location and Outreach Tool is a publicly available tool that allows users to visualize data on the number, location, and historical use of Election Day vote centers and polling places, and to project equitable distributions of locations for upcoming elections.

Stephen S. PettigrewHarvard University2017
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This PhD dissertation examines U.S. election administration through three empirical studies. Three core contributions: (1) documentation of racial disparities in voter wait times across polling places, showing that Black and Latino voters wait significantly longer than white voters due to differential resource allocation; (2) analysis of how the partisan and demographic composition of jurisdictions predicts administrative resource levels; and (3) estimation of the downstream turnout consequences of long waits, showing that each additional hour of waiting reduces the probability of future voting. Chapters were subsequently published in Political Science Quarterly and Electoral Studies. Advisor: Gary King.

Lisa Schur, Mason Ameri, Meera Adya2017
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper finds that voters with disabilities face significant barriers to in-person voting, including inaccessible polling places and equipment, which contribute to lower turnout rates among this group.