Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

186 Resources

In-Person Voting Workforce Tools

This toolkit helps election officials design and produce the materials poll workers need to set up and operate a polling place or vote center, including layout diagrams, signage, and procedural materials. It covers both traditional polling places and vote center models.

R. Michael Alvarez, Jian Cao, Yimeng LiCalifornia Institute of Technology2021
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper explores how voting experiences and fraud perceptions influence voter confidence, revealing that negative voting experiences, particularly long wait times, are linked to decreased confidence and increased perceptions of fraud.

Katherine Clayton, Nicholas Davis, Brendan Nyhan, Ethan Porter, Timothy Ryan, Thomas Wood2021
Voter Trust Academic Papers

This academic article studies how messages from political elites influence public confidence in elections and acceptance of democratic norms.

John Fortier and Charles Stewart IIIMIT Election Data and Science Lab/ American Enterprise Institute2021
In-Person Voting Reports

This report reviews multiple topics related to conducting the 2020 general election, including meeting the challenge of voting in person during the COVIS-19 pandemic.

Voter Trust Reports

This survey report focuses on election misinformation, fraud narratives, or public misperceptions and their effects on confidence in U.S. elections. It is relevant because beliefs about fraud and exposure to misleading claims are central mechanisms through which confidence in election outcomes rises or falls. For this dataset, it helps explain why the 2020 election became a turning point in public debates over fraud, mail voting, certification, and legitimacy.

Jennifer Gaudette, Seth Hill, Thad Kousser, Mackenzie Lockhart, Mindy Romero, Laura UribeCenter for Inclusive Democracy2021
Voter Trust Academic Papers

Report offering solutions on how public information campaigns by state election officials could mitigate polarized trust in election integrity.

Cynthia Chen, Arisa Sadeghpour, Matt Lamb2021
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

In this paper, authors analyze how transitioning to vote centers impacts voters' experiences, noting that inadequate implementation may result in longer waits and increased voter dissatisfaction.

Joshua D. Clinton, Nick Eubank, Adriane Fresh, Michael E. Shepherd2021
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper examines how changes in Election Day polling place locations affect voter turnout. The authors analyze voter behavior in three presidential elections in North Carolina (2008 - 2016), finding that these changes reduce Election Day voting on average, but that the reduction is offset by substitution into early voting.

John Curiel, Charles Stewart III, Jack WilliamsMIT Election Data + Science Lab2021
Voter Trust Reports

This MIT Election Data + Science Lab analysis explains the 2020 “blue shift,” where later-counted ballots disproportionately favored Democrats, and why that pattern mattered for public interpretation of results.

Nicholas D. Bernardo, Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz, Gretchen A. Macht2021
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

In this paper, authors explore how ballot length affects specific types of voting errors, including human-machine interaction errors and voter ballot-marking errors.

Juan GilbertStanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project2020
In-Person Voting Tools

This system allows poll workers to hand out tickets to voters waiting in line. Tickets are printed on demand and include a QR code with a date and time for the voter to return, available in English and Spanish. When voters return, the QR code is scanned, and they proceed to vote, reducing physical wait times.

Charles Stewart IIIMIT Election Data + Science Lab2020
Voter Trust Reports

This post-election survey reports on how Americans cast ballots in 2020 and how confident they were that votes were counted accurately.