Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

83 Resources

Jennifer MorrellDemocracy Fund2021
Audits & Validating Elections Reports

This report discusses ballot-accounting audits as a complementary check to tabulation audits, emphasizing reconciliation and chain of custody.

Eric McGhee, Charlotte Hill, Mindy Romero2021
Usability & Accessibility Voter Registration Academic Papers

In this paper, authors examine the effects of automatic voter registration (AVR) on both registration and turnout. They find that ind it does raise registration rates substantially, that the effect of AVR gradually builds the longer it is in place, and that the different types of AVR have significantly different effects on both registration and turnout.

Thessalia MerivakiMississippi State University2021
Voter Registration Academic Papers

This book examines the dynamics behind shifts in voter registration rates across the states.

Sam Royston, Ben Greenberg, Omeed Tavasoli, Courtenay Cotton2021
Voter Registration Academic Papers

In this paper, authors use snapshots of voter registration files (VRF) over time and machine learning models to test the effectiveness of unsupervised anomaly detection methods in detecting VRF modifications. They find that statistical models comparing administrative districts within a short time span and non-negative matrix factorization are most effective for surfacing anomalous events for review.

Erica Shein, Alexandra BrownInternational Foundation for Electoral Systems2021
Audits & Validating Elections Reports

The guide provides a basic framework for testing risk limiting audits in diverse contexts by outlining foundational prerequisites and operational, legal and regulatory considerations

Simon Jackman, Bradley Spahn2021
Voter Registration Academic Papers

In this paper, authors match a high-quality, random sample of the U.S. population to multiple lists revealing that at least 11% of the adult citizenry is not on a voter list. An additional 12% is mislisted (i.e., not living at their recorded address).

Gregory A. Huber, Marc Meredith, Michael Morse, Sarah Solnick2021
Voter Registration Academic Papers

This research analyzes registrants in Wisconsin who were identified as potential movers and did not respond to a subsequent postcard. At least 4% of these registrants cast a ballot at their address of registration, with minority registrants twice as likely as white registrants to do so.

Seo-Young Silvia Kim, R. Michael Alvarez, Spencer SchneiderCalifornia Institute of Technology2020
Voter Registration Academic Papers

In this article, using data from Orange County, California, the researchers develop two methods for evaluating the quality of voter registration data as it changes over time: (a) generating audit data by repeated record linkage across periodic snapshots of a given database and monitoring it for sudden anomalous changes and (b) identifying duplicates via an efficient, automated duplicate detection, and tracking new duplicates and deduplication efforts over time.

Enrijeta Shino, Michael D. Martinez, Michael P. McDonald, Daniel A. Smith2020
Voter Registration Academic Papers

This study investigates the reliability of Florida’s voter registration files through a phone survey, asking respondents to verify their records. Authors find 17.7% of registrants fail to verify at least one identifying piece of information.

Sharad Goel, Marc Meredith, Michael Morse, David Rothschild, Houshmand Shirani-Mehr2020
Voter Registration Academic Papers

This research develops and applies a method to estimate how many people voted twice in the 2012 presidential election. It estimates that about one in 4,000 voters cast two ballots, although an audit suggests that the true rate may be lower due to small errors in electronic vote records.

Thessalia MerivakiMississippi State University2020
Voter Registration Academic Papers

This research argues that local challenges remain when maintaining voters’ registration and voting history information, which undermines the quality of voter lists and the integrity of the electoral process. It analyzes Mississippi’s Statewide Election Management System (SEMS) records and finds that voter registration and voting history errors are linked to the county’s active and inactive registered voter rates and demographic characteristics.