Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

123 Resources

Ready for Tuesday2026
Voter Registration Reports

This report provides guidance to election officials to communicate about the work they are doing related to voter list maintenance.

Christian FongUniversity of Michigan2026
Voter Trust Academic Papers

This academic paper revisits public attitudes about voter identification and voter fraud in a period of intensifying partisan polarization. It is relevant because beliefs about fraud and exposure to misleading claims are central mechanisms through which confidence in election outcomes rises or falls.

Wren Orey, William T. AdlerBipartisan Policy Center2026
Voter Registration Reports

This analysis suggests that documentary proof of citizenship requirements would affect voters across the electorate. While Democrats and Republicans possess some form of documentary proof at similar rates, Republicans’ reliance on birth certificates mean they may be more heavily impacted by documentary proof requirements than Democrats. Additionally, wealthier and more highly educated voters are more likely to have documentary proof than others.

Joshua D. ClintonVanderbilt University2026
Voter Trust Academic Papers

This study characterizes how confidence in the accuracy of national elections changed with the projected election of President Trump on Election Day.

Cheryl Boudreau, Jennifer Gaudette, Thad Kousser, Seth J. Hill, Mackenzie Lockhart, Laura Uribe Yale University2026
Voter Trust Academic Papers

Paper sharing the results of three studies exploring the effectiveness of earned and paid media, federal vs state elected officials, and videos vs static images to convey trusted election information.

Voter Registration Academic Papers

The resources below are designed to help election officials manage the process of registering voters and creating, updating, and maintaining voter records.

Jennifer Gaudette, Seth Hill, Thad Kousser, Mackenzie Lockhart, Mindy Romero, Laura Uribe2026
Voter Trust Academic Papers

This research focuses on the results of novel survey experiments that expose respondents in one state to messages produced by election officials in another state. Republicans, Democrats, and Independents all become more trusting once they are exposed to information about other states’ election protections.

Jennifer Gaudette, Mac LockhartYale University2026
Voter Trust Briefs

Article summarizing how short-form, low-budget vertical videos can be used by election officials to improve voter trust.

Eric Plutzer, Gary Adler, Rebecca Sager, Jonathan S Coley, Damon Mayrl2025
Voter Trust Academic Papers

This academic paper examines the administrative practices, official communications, or legal steps that help voters understand and trust election outcomes. It is relevant because trusted, timely, and nonpartisan communication is one of the main tools election officials and civic groups use to counter distrust. For this dataset, it helps capture the most recent post-2020 trust environment and the continuing effects of election denial, security concerns, and polarization.

Cheryl Boudreau, Jennifer Gaudette, Thad Kousser, Seth J. Hill, Mackenzie Lockhart, Laura Uribe2025
Voter Trust Academic Papers

Three experiments about election official messaging are summarized, which:(a) compare the impact of messages conveyed through earned versus paid media; (b) ask whether Americans are more responsive to messages from federal or from state election officials; (c) explore the impact of videos and static visuals.

John M. Carey, Brian Fogarty, Marília Gehrke, Brendan Nyhan, Jason Reifler 2025
Voter Trust Academic Papers

Study investigating how to counter misinformation about voting and election fraud using a comparitive study between the United States and Brazil.

Center for Election Innovation and Research2025
Voter Registration Reports

CEIR has surveyed states about voter registration database security every two years since 2018. These surveys have demonstrated widespread best practices in respondent states.