Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

141 Resources

Joshua D. HostetterUniversity of South Florida2020
Workforce Academic Papers

Hostetter argues that portable poll worker registration—permitting registered voters to work statewide in any election precinct—increases the ease of filling poll worker positions. She uses the 2008-2018 Election Administration and Voting Survey to test her hypothesis. She finds support for her hypothesis, suggesting that potential benefits would arise from allowing citizens to work in any precinct.

Voting Rights Lab Partners2020
Voter Trust Reports

This report / guidance examines election results communication in relation to the entry’s stated focus on election results; delays; public communication. It is relevant because trusted, timely, and nonpartisan communication is one of the main tools election officials and civic groups use to counter distrust.

Yochai Benkler, Casey Tilton, Bruce Etling, Hal Roberts, Justin Clark, Robert Faris, Jonas Kaiser, Carolyn ScmittBerkman Klein Center2020
Voter Trust Reports

This report finds that the disinformation campaign surrounding the risk of voter fraud associated with mail-in ballots follows an elite-driven, mass media model.

Holly Ann Garnett, Pam SimpsonMIT Election Data + Science Lab2019
Voter Trust Reports

This explainer reviews public attitudes toward voting machines, ballot-marking devices, paper records, and related election technologies and describes how confidence depends not only on actual system security but also on whether voters understand the safeguards protecting registration, voting, and counting.

Jesse ClarkMIT Election Data + Science Lab2019
Voter Trust Academic Papers

This paper, focusing on Colorado and Washington, finds that the implementation of vote by mail causes a significant decrease in voter confidence in both states. However, this decrease appears to be temporary, disappearing after only single election cycle.

Betsy Sinclair, Steven S. Smith, Patrick D. Tucker2018
Voter Trust Academic Papers

This paper finds that the "winner" effect mitigates the effects from strong pre-election cues from elites. It also shows the effect of pre-election attention to the rigging issue.

MIT Election Data + Science Lab2018
Voter Trust Reports

This post-election survey reports on how Americans cast ballots in 2018 and how confident they were that votes were counted accurately.

Paul Gronke, Paul Manson, Evan CrawfordElections & Voting Information Center2018
Workforce Reports

The inaugural 2018 Local Election Official Survey solicited opinions about election administration, access, integrity, and reform. In this survey, election officials highlight concerns regarding resources, staffing, and coordination between state and local officials.

Mirya R. Holman, J. Celeste Lay2018
Voter Trust Academic Papers

This paper examines whether correcting information can overcome misperceptions about election fraud. It finds that providing counter information is generally ineffective at remedying misperceptions and can, depending on the source, increase endorsements of misperceptions among Republicans.

Bridgett A. KingMIT Election Data + Science Lab2018
Voter Trust In-Person Voting Workforce Academic Papers

This research focuses on whether voters’ confidence is shaped by the racial or ethnic representation of poll workers and election staff.

Adriano Udani, David C. Kimball, Brian Fogarty2018
Voter Trust Academic Papers

This paper finds that media coverage of voter fraud is associated with public beliefs about voter fraud. In states where fraud was more frequently featured in local media outlets, public concerns about voter fraud were heightened. In particular, the paper finds that press attention to voter fraud has a larger influence on Republicans than Democrats and Independents.

Lisa Schur, Douglas Kruse, Meera Adya2017
Usability & Accessibility Workforce Academic Papers

In this paper, authors explore the role of polling place inaccessibility in contributing to the voting gap among people with disabilities. Authors found that, in the 2012 elections, the turnout gap was reduced but not eliminated and that 30% of voters with disabilities experienced difficulties voting. These findings support the claim that difficulties voting depress voter turnout.