Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

170 Resources

Jenifer M. Favreau, Emily Kay Hanks2016
Workforce Academic Papers

This article highlights the complexity of designing and implementing poll worker training programs given the varying requirements of federal, state and local laws. Authors examine the unique practices of administrators in Williamson County, Texas, hearing first-hand and how they identify shortcomings of poll worker programs and implement improvements based on lessons learned.

Kathleen Hale, Mitchell BrownAuburn University2016
Workforce Academic Papers

Hale and Brown examine the local networks of election officials throughout the U.S. and the information exchanged between them. They demonstrate the ways in which local networks are central to innovation, key to the spread of new ideas from one locality to another, and fundamental to improving this area of public service across the country.

J. Drew SeibMurray State University2016
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper finds that longer ballots cause voters to become more frantic, adopt various search strategies, and spend less time researching each candidate, which raises the chances of errors and missing races.

Whitney Quesenbery, Lynn Baumeister, Caitlin Rinn, Dana Chisnell, Shaneé Dawkins, Sharon LaskowskiCenter for Civic Design2016
In-Person Voting Reports

This three-part report explores the usability of electronic poll books for poll workers and voters. It includes (1) a landscape analysis of e-pollbook usability within polling locations, (2) a usability test plan that election officials and vendors can implement, and (3) a checklist of usability and accessibility features for procurement and assessment.

Stephen Ansolabehere, Daron Shaw2016
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper surveys local election officials to examine their knowledge of Election Day lines and the steps they take to address them, finding that data collection and resource flexibility are key to reducing wait times.

Mark PelczarskiCaltech-MIT Voting Technology Project2015
In-Person Voting Tools

This simulation tool estimates potential voter wait times based on projected turnout, average time to vote for a specific ballot and equipment, and average check-in time per voter. It helps officials understand how different combinations of resources and voter loads translate into line lengths.

Stephen Graves, Rong YuanCaltech-MIT Voting Technology Project2015
In-Person Voting Tools

This tool uses queueing theory to calculate the minimum number of service stations (poll books, voting booths, etc.) at each step of the polling place process to meet a target maximum wait time. It offers both a web interface for simple models and a downloadable Excel spreadsheet for jurisdiction-wide planning across hundreds of polling places simultaneously.

Charles Stewart III, Stephen Ansolabehere2015
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper reviews evidence on the causes and consequences of long wait times at polling places, and discusses policy interventions that have been shown to reduce lines and improve the voter experience.

Charles Stewart III, Stephen Graves, Aaron Strauss, Mark PelczarskiCaltech-MIT Voting Technology Project2015
In-Person Voting Tools

This resource is an open-access election management toolkit with calculators and tools to help election officials plan polling place resources, minimize wait times, and optimize poll worker and equipment allocation.

Barry C. Burden, Jeffrey Milyo2015
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper analyzes the quantity and quality of poll workers, highlighting that performance, rather than numbers alone, is a key factor in voter satisfaction and the efficient conduct of elections.

Usability & Accessibility In-Person Voting Tools

This guide walks election officials through how to make election technologies such as online voter registration, polling place apps, and electronic poll books accessible to people with disabilities. It introduces the POUR principles as a framework for evaluating accessibility, recommends a layered testing approach for election systems, and points to free accessibility tools.

Charles Stewart IIICaltech-MIT Voting Technology Project2015
In-Person Voting Reports

This report provides guidance for local election officials on how to collect and use data to manage polling place resources more effectively, including diagnosing congestion and allocating voting machines and poll workers.