Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

35 Resources

Whitney QuesenberyCenter for Civic Design2019
Usability & Accessibility Reports

In 2015, the Center for Civic Design outlined six priority areas for improving the usability and accessibility of election systems. This report details progress toward incorporating these priorities into the VVSG 2.0. It also details related efforts by election community stakeholders to implement these priorities.

Christopher Patten, Dana ChisnellCenter for Civic Design2019
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report draws on ethnographic interviews with naturalized U.S. citizens to explore why so eligible immigrant voters don't participate in elections. Researchers found that voting barriers go beyond language, including distrust of government, the overwhelming logistics of adjusting to life in the U.S., and gaps in civic literacy. The report offers practical recommendations for election officials to remove barriers to new citizens participating in civic life.

Lisa Schur, Douglas KruseRutgers University2018
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report highlights key trends in voter turnout among voters with disabilities in the 2018 elections. Authors note an increase in turnout among these voters compared to the 2014 midterms. They found that employed voters with disabilities were just as likely to vote as employed voters without disabilities, suggesting a link between employment and political participation.

Sharon Laskowski, Shaneé Dawkins, Whitney Quesenbery, Nancy Frishberg, Pam Smith, Keith InstoneCenter for Civic Design2017
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report proposes principles and guidelines for the design and development of remote ballot marking systems, considering them in their entirety. This includes the technical systems that make up a remote ballot marking system, the accessibility features and communications needed to support all voters, and the election administration procedures to deploy a remote ballot marking system.

Sharon Laskowski, Shaneé Dawkins, Whitney Quesenbery, Nancy Frishberg, Pam Smith, Keith InstoneCenter for Civic Design2017
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report proposes principles and guidelines for the design and development of remote ballot marking systems based on a review of current literature and existing standards for voting systems and accessibility and input from experts in the field. The principles support the development of systems that are usable, accessible, and secure, addressing the perceived conflict accessibility and strong election integrity.

Kathryn Summers, Whitney Quesenbery, Amy Pointer2016
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This paper describes a two-pronged effort to increase the accessibility and inclusivity of the vote by mail process for voters who are blind, have low vision, or low dexterity and voters who read at Basic or Below Basic levels. These efforts focus on the accessibility and usability of Maryland's online ballot marking tool and revising paper instructions and envelopes in vote-by-mail packages.

Whitney Quesenbery, Jennifer SuttonCenter for Civic Design2016
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This white paper reviews the types of personal assistive technology (AT) that voters might use in the polling place. It focuses on technologies that are either currently in common use, or in early stages of development and may be widely available in the future.

Lisa Schur, Douglas KruseRutgers University2016
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report summarizes projections of how many people with disabilities would be eligible to vote in the November 2016 elections, using data from the Census Bureau’s 2010-2014 American Community Survey combined with Census Bureau population projections. The report breaks down key demographic characteristics of eligible voters with disabilities.

Lisa Schur, Douglas KruseRutgers University2016
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report highlights key trends in voter turnout among voters with disabilities in the 2016 elections. Authors note continuing gaps in registration and turnout of voters with disabilities compared to that of voters without disabilities. Voters with disabilities were also more likely to vote by mail before election day, reflecting the mobility problems faced by some voters with disabilities.

Lisa Schur, Douglas KruseRutgers University2010
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report highlights key trends in voter turnout among voters with disabilities in the 2010 elections. Authors find that turnout by voters with disabilities was 3 percentage points lower than voters without disabilities. Authors analyze this trend by state, age, vote method, and employment status, among others.

Lisa Schur, Douglas KruseRutgers University2008
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report highlights key trends in voter turnout among voters with disabilities in the 2008 elections. Authors find that turnout by voters with disabilities was 3 percentage points lower than voters without disabilities. Authors analyze this trends by state, age, vote method, and employment, among others.