Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

156 Resources

National Association of Secretaries of State2024
Audits & Validating Elections Reports

This report supports automated independent audits as a complement or alternative to other post-election audit methods. It may be useful for administrators or policymakers in comparing auditing approaches.

Maryland General Assembly, Department of Legislative Services2024
Audits & Validating Elections Reports

This report analyzes a Maryland bill that would require risk-limiting audits after statewide elections, including fiscal and administrative implications.

Lisa Schur, Douglas KruseRutgers University2024
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report summarizes projections of how many people with disabilities would be eligible to vote in the November 2024 elections, using data from the Census Bureau’s 2018-2022 American Community Survey combined with Census Bureau population projections for 2024. The report breaks down key demographic characteristics of eligible voters with disabilities.

Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report and the guidelines contained therein explain how a successful accessible RCV ballot works for voters with disabilities. The goal of this work was to create a universal design for a Ranked Choice Voting ballot that would work for the most voters without special settings needed.

Suzanne Chapman, Lynn Baumeister, Whitney QuesenberyNational Institute of Standards2024
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This report describes qualitative research conducted to gain deeper insights about how voters mark, review, verify, and cast their ballots. It is part of the work to update the human factors—accessibility, usability, and voter privacy—requirements in federal voting system standards and fill gaps in our understanding of how voters interact with ballot marking devices.

Whitney Quesenbery, Suzanne Chapman, Christopher Patten, Roberto SpreggiaroNational Institute of Standards2024
Usability & Accessibility Reports

This review of the literature was done for research to understand how voters approach the task of marking, reviewing, verifying, and casting a ballot. It includes not only research on voting systems and voting, but on related issues of trust, privacy, and mental models. This report is a companion to the research report NIST GCR 24-051 How Voters Review and Verify Ballots.

Charles Stewart IIIMIT Election Data + Science Lab2024
Voter Trust Reports

This post-election survey reports on how Americans cast ballots in 2024 and how confident they were that votes were counted accurately.

Marek N. Posard, Todd C. Helmus, Michelle Woods, Bilva ChandraRAND Corporation2024
Voter Trust Reports

This RAND resource addresses technology, misinformation, political violence, or public communication risks that could affect trust in the 2024 election environment. It is relevant because confidence depends not only on actual system security but also on whether voters understand the safeguards protecting registration, voting, and counting. For this dataset, it helps capture the most recent post-2020 trust environment and the continuing effects of election denial, security concerns, and polarization.

Voter Trust Workforce Reports

This Brennan Center survey reports on local election officials’ experiences with security, threats, funding, staffing, and preparation for the 2024 election environment. It is relevant because trusted, timely, and nonpartisan communication is one of the main tools election officials and civic groups use to counter distrust. For this dataset, it helps capture the most recent post-2020 trust environment and the continuing effects of election denial, security concerns, and polarization.

Voter Trust Issue Briefs

This NCSL resource summarizes state election policy, administrative practices, or public communication guidance for lawmakers seeking to improve accuracy and confidence. It is relevant because direct voter experiences—such as wait times, poll-worker interactions, and access to services—shape confidence in election administration. For this dataset, it helps capture the most recent post-2020 trust environment and the continuing effects of election denial, security concerns, and polarization.

Elisa Shearer, Michael Lipka, Sarah Naseer, Emily Tomasik and Mark JurkowitzPew Research Center2024
Voter Trust Issue Briefs

This Pew Research Center brief reports public-opinion findings relevant to election confidence, information trust, partisanship, or expectations about the 2024 election cycle. It is relevant because beliefs about fraud and exposure to misleading claims are central mechanisms through which confidence in election outcomes rises or falls. For this dataset, it helps capture the most recent post-2020 trust environment and the continuing effects of election denial, security concerns, and polarization.

Center for Election Innovation and Research2024
Voter Registration Reports

CEIR interviewed and surveyed election officials in four states—Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, and Rhode Island—to create case studies about their experiences planning, developing, and implementing a new voter registration database system.