Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

264 Resources

Claudia Ziegler Acemyan, Philip KortumRice University2016
Usability & Accessibility Academic Papers

This study sought to examine whether voting equipment layouts impact anticipated voting system usability. Through tests with thirty-five participants, authors found that configurations of voting machines inside a polling station impacted all subjective ratings, suggesting that environmental variables might need to be considered when configuring polling stations to maximize usability.

John B. Holbein, D. Sunshine HilygusDuke University2016
Usability & Accessibility Academic Papers

In this paper, authors examine the effectiveness of preregistration laws in increasing voter turnout. Authors find that preregistration does increases voter turnout, with equal effectiveness for various subgroups in the electorate.

Peter Miller, Sierra PowellUniversity of Pennsylvania2016
Usability & Accessibility Academic Papers

Miller and Powell examine the extent to which people with disabilities vote in person or utilize convenience voting reforms relative to voters without disabilities. They find that voters with a disability are significantly less likely to vote but are more likely to vote by mail ballot. They also examine the efficacy of several additional reforms such as early voting in increasing turnout among voters with disabilities.

Charles Stewart III, Stephen Ansolabehere, Nathaniel Persily2016
Voter Trust Academic Papers

This article revisits public attitudes about voter identification and voter fraud in a period of intensifying partisan polarization, focusing on beliefs about fraud and exposure to misleading claims being central mechanisms through which confidence in election outcomes rises or falls.

Stephen Ansolabehere, Daron Shaw2016
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper surveys local election officials to examine their knowledge of Election Day lines and the steps they take to address them, finding that data collection and resource flexibility are key to reducing wait times.

J. Drew SeibMurray State University2016
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper finds that longer ballots cause voters to become more frantic, adopt various search strategies, and spend less time researching each candidate, which raises the chances of errors and missing races.

Claudia Ziegler Acemyan, Philip KortumRice University2016
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper finds that the placement and configuration of voting booths, including the spacing between machines and the use of dividers, significantly increase levels of anticipated voting system usability and voter confidence.

Michael C. Herron, Daniel A. Smith2016
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper examines how precinct-level resources such as staffing, equipment, and voter arrival patterns influence voter wait times, revealing that resource allocation decisions are a key factor in long lines.

Brian Amos, Daniel A. Smith, Casey Ste. ClaireUniversity of Florida2016
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper finds that Hispanic voters were more likely to abstain from voting after being reassigned to a different Election Day polling place than voters in other racial groups.

Philip Kortum, Michael D. Byrne2016
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper reviews how voting systems that are not designed to support human perceptual and cognitive limitations pose a serious threat to accurate ballot recording, and have almost certainly altered election outcomes in the United States.

Jenifer M. Favreau, Emily Kay Hanks2016
Workforce Academic Papers

This article highlights the complexity of designing and implementing poll worker training programs given the varying requirements of federal, state and local laws. Authors examine the unique practices of administrators in Williamson County, Texas, hearing first-hand and how they identify shortcomings of poll worker programs and implement improvements based on lessons learned.

Kathleen Hale, Mitchell BrownAuburn University2016
Workforce Academic Papers

Hale and Brown examine the local networks of election officials throughout the U.S. and the information exchanged between them. They demonstrate the ways in which local networks are central to innovation, key to the spread of new ideas from one locality to another, and fundamental to improving this area of public service across the country.