Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

262 Resources

Adriano Udani, David C. Kimball, Brian Fogarty2018
Voter Trust Academic Papers

This paper finds that media coverage of voter fraud is associated with public beliefs about voter fraud. In states where fraud was more frequently featured in local media outlets, public concerns about voter fraud were heightened. In particular, the paper finds that press attention to voter fraud has a larger influence on Republicans than Democrats and Independents.

Mirya R. Holman, J. Celeste Lay2018
Voter Trust Academic Papers

This paper examines whether correcting information can overcome misperceptions about election fraud. It finds that providing counter information is generally ineffective at remedying misperceptions and can, depending on the source, increase endorsements of misperceptions among Republicans.

Bridgett A. KingMIT Election Data + Science Lab2018
Voter Trust In-Person Voting Workforce Academic Papers

This research focuses on whether voters’ confidence is shaped by the racial or ethnic representation of poll workers and election staff.

Thessalia Merivaki, Sean ConnerMississippi State University2018
Voter Registration Academic Papers

The analysis finds notable discrepancies in how voter registration data are reported by localities into Mississippi’s Statewide Election Management System (SEMS), as well as discrepancies in how such data are reported by the state to the EAC’s Election Administration and Voting Survey (EAVS). This suggests that some localities face more challenges in managing records under a hybrid structure than others, which can disproportionately impact voters on Election Day, depending on where they reside.

Loren Collingwood, William McGuire, Benjamin Gonzalez O’Brien, Katherine E. Baird, Sarah Hampson2018
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

In Washington, the research finds that distance to the closest ballot drop box increases one's probability of voting but primarily in off-year elections and primaries.

Jacob Jaffe, Charles Stewart III, Jacob CoblentzCaltech-MIT Voting Technology Project2018
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

In this paper, authors develop models to estimate voter service times from voting machine log data, providing election officials with a scalable approach to analyze and improve polling place operations.

Ronald L. RivestMIT Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory2017
Audits & Validating Elections Academic Papers

In this paper, authors introduces ClipAudit, a simplified risk-limiting post-election audit method intended to make statistical audits more understandable and implementable.

Ronald L. Rivest, Philip B. Stark, Zara Perumal2017
Audits & Validating Elections Academic Papers

This paper explores voting-rule design choices that can reduce audit burden and improve auditability, with implications for post-election verification.

Ronald L. RivestMIT Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory2017
Audits & Validating Elections Academic Papers

In this paper, authors explain what risk limiting audits do and do not verify, emphasizing paper-ballot examination and the distinction between outcome verification and other election processes.

Lisa Schur, Douglas Kruse, Meera Adya2017
Usability & Accessibility Workforce Academic Papers

In this paper, authors explore the role of polling place inaccessibility in contributing to the voting gap among people with disabilities. Authors found that, in the 2012 elections, the turnout gap was reduced but not eliminated and that 30% of voters with disabilities experienced difficulties voting. These findings support the claim that difficulties voting depress voter turnout.

Brian Amos, Daniel A. Smith, Casey Ste. ClaireUniversity of Florida2017
Usability & Accessibility Academic Papers

In this paper, authors find that relocating or eliminating election day polling places affects some voters more than others. Specifically, younger voters and Hispanic voters have lower turnout when reassigned polling places compared to those that were not. These findings bear important implications for voting accessibility among these groups.

Kimberly R Huyser, Gabriel R Sanchez, Edward D Vargas2017
Usability & Accessibility Academic Papers

In this paper, authors compare American Indian (AI) and Alaska Native (AN) registration, voting, and overall civic engagement to other racial and ethnic groups. They find several key socio-economic status indicators predicting civic and political engagement uniquely for AI/ANs, but they are not consistently significant across all years or all types of political participation.