Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

262 Resources

Sharad Goel, Marc Meredith, Michael Morse, David Rothschild, Houshmand Shirani-Mehr2020
Voter Registration Academic Papers

This research develops and applies a method to estimate how many people voted twice in the 2012 presidential election. It estimates that about one in 4,000 voters cast two ballots, although an audit suggests that the true rate may be lower due to small errors in electronic vote records.

Seo-Young Silvia Kim, R. Michael Alvarez, Spencer SchneiderCalifornia Institute of Technology2020
Voter Registration Academic Papers

In this article, using data from Orange County, California, the researchers develop two methods for evaluating the quality of voter registration data as it changes over time: (a) generating audit data by repeated record linkage across periodic snapshots of a given database and monitoring it for sudden anomalous changes and (b) identifying duplicates via an efficient, automated duplicate detection, and tracking new duplicates and deduplication efforts over time.

Christopher B. Mann, Paul Gronke, Natalie Adona2020
Voter Registration Academic Papers

This research finds that when automatic voter registration (AVR) is endorsed by Democratic leaders, Republicans (and independents) expect AVR to reduce the fairness and legitimacy of elections, while Democrats are generally resistant to partisan cues.

Andrew Menger, Robert M. Stein2020
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

This research tests four explanations for how vote by mail voters choose to return their ballot, including the social rewards of voting, the costs of voting, trust in U.S. Postal Service and a preference to cast a ballot after campaigning ends. It finds supporting evidence for each explanation conditioned by prior history of voting.

Daniel M. Thompson, Jennifer Wu, Jesse Yoder, Andrew B. HallStanford University2020
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

This research finds that expanding universal vote-by-mail has not dramatically advantaged either party historically.

Michael Barber, John B. Holbein2020
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

Examining two states that have conducted a staggered rollout of mandatory vote-by-mail (Washington and Utah), this research finds that mandatory vote-by-mail slightly increases voter turnout but has no effect on election outcomes at various levels of government.

Daniel M. Thompson, Jennifer A. Wu, Jesse Yoder, Andrew B. Hall2020
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

Authors collect data from 1996-2018 on all three U.S. states who implemented universal vote-by-mail in a staggered fashion across counties, allowing us to use a difference-in-differences design at the county level to estimate causal effects. They find that: (1) universal vote-by-mail does not appear to affect either party's share of turnout; (2) universal vote-by-mail does not appear to increase either party's vote share; and (3) universal vote-by-mail modestly increases overall average turnout rates, in line with previous estimates.

William McGuire, Benjamin Gonzalez O’Brien, Katherine E. Baird, Benjamin Corbett, Loren Collingwood2020
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

The research finds that drop boxes have a positive effect on voter turnout and that decreasing the distance to these boxes can lead to an increased likelihood of voting.

Jenny Blessing, Julian Gomez, McCoy Patiño, Tran Nguyen2020
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

The research finds that online voter registration systems in some states have vulnerabilities that allow adversaries to alter or effectively prevent a voter's registration. The analysis additionally finds that ballot tracking systems raise serious privacy questions surrounding ease of access to voter data.

Roxana Arjon, et al.2020
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

This study of California focuses on (1) vote-by-mail signature verification processes and (2) notice and remedy procedures for unverified signatures.

Lisa A. BryantCalifornia State University2020
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

In this research, voters were randomly assigned to either an in-person or absentee voting condition. Participants assigned to the absentee condition expressed lower levels of confidence that their votes would be counted correctly than those assigned to the in-person voting condition. Voters who had to ask for assistance during the experiment also reported lower levels of confidence.

John Kuk, Zoltan Hajnal, Nazita Lajevardi2020
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

In this paper, authors find that strict voter ID laws impose a disproportionate burden on minority voters and have significant negative effects on turnout among racial and ethnic minority groups.