Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

285 Resources

Ryan Kennedy, Lydia Brashear Tiede, Adam L. Ozer, Nicolay Marinov2025
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

In this paper, authors explore whether reliance on algorithms or a hybrid system for verifying signatures allay or increase citizens' confidence in using them in elections. They find that respondents similarly trust automated and non-automated systems, but do not have a clear conception of the confidence threshold, set by policymakers, necessary for rejecting ballots.

Tracey B. CarterBelmont University2025
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

In this paper, Carter takes an in-depth look at absentee/mail-in voting pre and post COVID-19 pandemic. The paper recommends that more states should expand their access to voting by passing no-excuse absentee/mail-in voting laws due to the positive impacts of expanded mail voting policies on voters during the pandemic.

Voting by Mail Issue Briefs

This brief provides an overview of state policies related to absentee and mail voting. It discusses the potential advantages and disadvantages of voting by mail, outlines state policies for qualifying for and requesting an absentee ballot, and details how states process, verify, and count absentee/mail ballots. The brief concludes with key policy points related to by mail voting for policymakers to consider.

Gretchen A. Macht, Philip Kortum, Michael D. Byrne2025
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

In this paper, authors invite the human factors and ergonomics community to engage with election administration research. The paper describes the complexity and scale of U.S. election administration and identifies open research challenges where human factors expertise is directly applicable, including accessible design, poll worker training, and error minimization.

Gianna M. WadowskiUniversity of Rhode Island2025
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

In this MS thesis, the author investigates how voting equipment type (paper ballots, optical scan, and ballot marking devices) affects voting process performance across three elections at three locations. They use observational time studies and discrete-event simulation to model how different voting systems affect voter wait times, throughput, and overall process efficiency. The author find that performance improvements from adopting newer voting technologies are inconsistent across election contexts.

Anita Manion, Lisa A. Bryant, David Kimball, Gretchen Macht, Mindy Romero, Robert M. Stein2025
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper synthesizes best practices for in-person voting across polling place access, check-in and wait times, polling place layout and design, ballot design, and the voter experience.

Malinda P. FryUniversity of Rhode Island2025
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

In this MS thesis, Fry examines the accessibility of in-person voting equipment, specifically Ballot Marking Devices (BMDs) and Direct Recording Electronics (DREs), across U.S. elections from 2000 to 2024. She uses data from Verified Voting, the U.S. Census Bureau, and BMD/DRE manufacturers to analyze trends in the deployment of accessible equipment and to evaluate current systems against VVSG 2.0 Principle 7 (the right to vote privately and independently). The author finds that although accessible equipment coverage has improved substantially since HAVA, significant gaps remain in meeting current usability and accessibility standards.

Paul Gronke, Paul Manson2025
Workforce Academic Papers

In this paper, authors utilize "policyscape" and "policy drift" as lens to conceptualize stability and change in election administration. More specifically, policy drift helps to explain a disconnect between the current service expectations from these offices and existing models of staffing and workforce development. These conclusions were reached through interviews with local election officials in Oregon.

John M. Carey, Brian Fogarty, Marília Gehrke, Brendan Nyhan, Jason Reifler 2025
Voter Trust Academic Papers

Study investigating how to counter misinformation about voting and election fraud using a comparitive study between the United States and Brazil.

Benjamin Fuller, Rashmi Pai, Alexander RussellUniversity of Connecticut, Voting Technology Research Center2024
Audits & Validating Elections Academic Papers

This paper introduces Bayesian/low-variance risk limiting audit approaches using marginal mark recording to reduce variability and sample requirements.