Resources

Use our resource library to explore the latest research in the field of election science.

285 Resources

Michael C. Herron, Daniel A. Smith2021
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

With Maine as a case study, the research shows that, in the past four general elections, over 10% of vote-by-mail ballots arrived at local elections offices either on Election Day itself or one day earlier. Moreover, of the vote-by-mail ballots most vulnerable to postal delivery disruptions, a greater share of them were cast by unaffiliated voters and Democrats than by Republicans.

David Cottrell, Michael C. Herron, Daniel A. Smith2021
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

This analysis of the Florida general elections of 2016, 2018, and 2020 shows that voters inexperienced with mail voting disproportionately submit ballots that end up rejected due to (1) late arrival at elections offices or (2) signature defects on return envelopes. Inexperienced mail voters are up to three times more likely to have their ballots rejected compared to experienced mail voters.

Jesse T. ClarkPrinceton University2021
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

This analysis shows that the implementation of vote by mail causes a significant decrease in voter confidence in Washington and Colorado. However, this decrease appears to be temporary, disappearing after only a single election cycle.

Donald S. InbodyTexas State University2021
Voting by Mail Academic Papers

This paper provides a history of military voting by absentee ballot.

Emma C. McCool-GuglielmoUniversity of Rhode Island2021
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This MS thesis examines how polling place layout and path directionality affect voting system performance across turnout levels. The author models a two-step voting system in a theoretical 1,000 sq ft polling place using discrete event simulation, testing multiple layout configurations and voter routing strategies. They find that perimeter layouts with unidirectional voter flow minimize average travel distance and time-in-system across turnout levels.

Stephen PettigrewHarvard University2021
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

In this paper, Pettigrew demonstrate that for every additional hour a voter waits in line, their probability of voting in the subsequent election drops by one percentage point. He finds that negative experiences carry over to future elections disproportionately for underrepresented voters.

Nicholas D. Bernardo, Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz, Gretchen A. Macht2021
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

In this paper, authors explore how ballot length affects specific types of voting errors, including human-machine interaction errors and voter ballot-marking errors.

Cynthia Chen, Arisa Sadeghpour, Matt Lamb2021
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

In this paper, authors analyze how transitioning to vote centers impacts voters' experiences, noting that inadequate implementation may result in longer waits and increased voter dissatisfaction.

R. Michael Alvarez, Jian Cao, Yimeng LiCalifornia Institute of Technology2021
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper explores how voting experiences and fraud perceptions influence voter confidence, revealing that negative voting experiences, particularly long wait times, are linked to decreased confidence and increased perceptions of fraud.

Bernard L. Fraga, Michael G. Miller2021
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper examines which voters are disenfranchised by voter ID laws, finding disproportionate impacts on Latino and Black voters who are more likely to lack required identification.

Phoebe Henninger, Marc Meredith, Michael Morse2021
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

In this paper, authors find that non-white voters are more likely to lack acceptable photo identification, and that those voting without ID are disproportionately Latino and Black.

Joshua D. Clinton, Nick Eubank, Adriane Fresh, Michael E. Shepherd2021
In-Person Voting Academic Papers

This paper examines how changes in Election Day polling place locations affect voter turnout. The authors analyze voter behavior in three presidential elections in North Carolina (2008 - 2016), finding that these changes reduce Election Day voting on average, but that the reduction is offset by substitution into early voting.